We don't need no education,
We don't need no thought control,
No dark sarcasm in the classroom,
Teacher leave them kids alone,
Hey teacher! leave them kids alone!
All in all it's just another brick in the wall,
All in all you're just another brick in the wall.
I spent a chunk of my youth chanting along with this Pink Floyd rock anthem. So, I was intrigued to learn that one of the leading lights of the recent student riots in London was the Pink Floyd lead guitarist David Gilmour's son, Charlie Gilmour. The rioters were protesting the government's plans to raise university fees.
David Gilmour thinks education is worse than a waste of time. Yet, his son Charlie believes education is very important, and should be massively subsidized by the state. How did father and son wind up having such dramatically different views?
Or are their views really all that different? On reflection, I suspect not.
Neither father or son really has a point of view on the positive externalities created by subsidized, over-consumed higher education. They are not policy wonks. They are musicians. They are expressing an emotion. I think both father and son are expressing exactly the same emotion.
Jack Black captured this emotion precisely in School of Rock:
"The Man is everywhere. In the White House, down the hall, Mrs. Mullins (the head mistress), she's the Man. And the Man ruined the ozone, and he's burning down the Amazon, and he kidnapped Shamu and put her in a chlorine tank! And there used to be a way to stick it to The Man. It was called rock ‘n’ roll."
I think that is what both father and son were doing. As young men, they were sticking it to The Man. Once upon a time The Man said "go to school". Now, The Man says "you can't go to school unless you pay for school". Regardless, rock 'n roll wants to stick it to The Man.
Admittedly, the son did get a little excessively carried away. But one lesson he will have learnt from his father, and his father's friends, is that sticking it to The Man does not preclude making it up with The Man at some later stage. For all David Gilmour's angst about education, he still sent his son to an expensive private school, and on to read history at Cambridge.
4 comments:
Prithvi - you've been quite prolific over the past week. Stuck in the UK with snow all around?!
Interesting comparison - I would tend to agree with you. Pink Floyd (after all let's not forget Waters probably was a huge influence of the lyrics in the "the Wall") is a rock band (and an awesome one might I add) - but iconoclasm was very much their prescribed position. So education.
The issue in the UK on withdrawing education loans/ subsidies is a real issue that will impact the future of GB...
So while the dad said "we don't need no education" - what he really meant was "we don't need this kind of education" - haven't we all been there...
I love your blog! Thank you for the frequent updates you post!
Best of health and happiness in 2011 from an occasional blog visitor!
Thank you, Comedyrocks.
Ajit - The Wall video dramatizes an antiquated Victorian kind of education, with dark sarcasm and corporal punishment, that I doubt even David Gilmour or Roger Waters' generation suffered from.
Unfortunately, though, "we want liberal humanistic education rather nasty Victorian education" is too complex a thought to ever become an anthem.
Post a Comment