Friday, 7 March 2008

The Sultanganj Buddha



Should great works of art stolen by discredited, morally bankrupt empires be returned home?

This question has been rattling around in my head for a couple of weeks, since I stumbled upon a fabulous, life-size, 1500 year old bronze Buddha from Sultanganj, Bihar, in the Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery.

My mind came to rest at this thought: a day will come when India is rich enough and proud enough, to care for our heritage. Maybe not in my lifetime, but that day will come. That is when the Sultanganj Buddha ought to return home, perhaps to Sultanganj. But until then, it’s OK for the Buddha to stay on in Birmingham, where it has a place of honour and is displayed with sensitivity, respect and taste.

This is an interesting case, really. It is not an obvious story of rapacious, colonial plunder. This is not like the Kohinoor diamond, which was stolen by Queen Victoria for her crown from the crown of Maharajah Ranjit Singh.

Apparently, this Buddha was consecrated at the center of a Gupta era vihara on the right bank of the Ganga c. 500 AD. The vihara came under military threat c. 700 AD. The monks chose to bury their sacred icon rather than let it fall to their enemies. Their ruse worked. The vihara was razed. The Buddha survived, unseen but unharmed.

About 1200 years later, in 1862, a British engineer was laying a Railway line from Burdwan to Kiul. He was mining earth for ballast to lay under the railway track, and came upon a large, regular block harder than the earth around it. He mined around the block, dislodged it from the earth, chiseled open the block the next morning, and stared into the tranquil face of the Buddha.

The advice from his railway colleagues was to melt down the Buddha into rails. Not unreasonable; there is not a lot else that one can do with a massive metal thingummybob when living on a railway camp 500 miles upriver from Calcutta. But fortunately, a combination of fate, patience and the modern miracle of telegraph communication located a wealthy merchant who was willing to pay two hundred pounds to have the statue shipped to Birmingham. Maybe the Buddha travelled to Calcutta on the same railway tracks that he had so nearly become a part of. The weary Buddha finally reached Birmingham 1867.

The wealthy merchant, Mr Samuel Taylor, went on the become the mayor of Birmingham. On his death he donated his art collection to the city. Mr Samuel Taylor’s name is immortalized on a plaque near the Buddha. I couldn’t spot the name of the railway engineer.

So in what sense does the statue belong in India, or in Sultanganj, more than it does to the city of Mr Samuel Taylor?

One could make legalistic arguments here. The Greek state has trotted out a legal argument about the legitimacy of the Ottoman firman by which the British Museum acquired the Elgin marbles. But the argument which resonates with me (and apparently with the fair-minded British public who overwhelmingly support returning the Elgin marbles to Greece) is an argument about identity rather than legality.

India is not just the land of cricket, curry and customer service call centers. India is Bharatavarsh.

One of the most wonderful things about India - the modern nation state that was born in 1947 - is that India fiercely embraces its history. India isn't just a bunch of lines drawn on a map. India is charged with mythic meaning. India is the heir to the Mauryas and the Guptas, the Cheras and the Cholas, the grandeur of the Moghuls and the grit of the Marathas, heir to both Tansen and to Baiju Bawra. The choice of Ashoka's pillar as India's national symbol was inspired; the symbol of the "soul of a nation, long supressed, finding utterance".

That is the sense in which the Sultanganj Buddha might belong in India. The statue's story feels like the story of India itself. A nation, long suppressed, finds utterance. A magnificient statue, long buried, finds expression. The Sultanganj Buddha in Birmingham is just another beautiful museum-piece. The Sultanganj Buddha in India could be so much more redolent with meaning: the symbol of a great nation, once vanquished, now discovering it's own greatness.

The Sultanganj Buddha has his own tryst with destiny. The day hasn't yet come to redeem that pledge.

8 comments:

mat8iou said...

One of the distressing things about arguments over identity, is that many museums try & re-appropriate this argument as their own. The British Museum suggests that Elgin Marbls are now an integral part of their collection - but last year, a museum in Berlin went further, telling the Egyptians that the bust of Nefertiti was not more a part of their museum (because it had been there so long) than it was a part of Egypt's heritage.

Despite all this though, I believe the tide is turning & many of these artefacts will soon be repatriated with their original owners.

Yeshie said...

Well written. Very poetic and moving. Am impressed!

leanne said...

finally after two years after this blog. the statue makes news

Anonymous said...

hi very well written and impressed with your writing. well at least its making big news now after two years of your blog.

but i do feel some time all these artefacts, antiques, rare letters, statues, war memorabilia of mughals, sikh and tipu sultan time and paintings which are on display in different museum in england and scotland are there because of britsh empire. but on other hand we should thanks them by keeping them safe here and as they got good know how about keeping antiques.
there are loads of antique which gone in wrong hand and end up into KABADIWALA(scrap dealer) for some quick money.
well may be one day these things will travel to india

Unknown said...

Very nice article Prithvi.... missed it earlier, but I normally come back to read all your blogs :)

Viagra Online said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
victor vijay said...

the issue of plunder is within a wider context of West.My book MONA LISA DOES NOT SMILE ANYMORE(ISBN 9788184655124) deals with the art of India n West, I quote, "Unfortunately the West has acted against the tenets of humanity in the 500 years it ascended to economic and ‘cultural glory’. The so called Age of Renaissance in reality had been an age of prosperity for some in Europe while for others it had been age of mayhem, plunder and enslavement." Britain return what is morally rankling--loot by the 'gentiles' from 'Barbarian' Indians.

Ravi Shankar said...

Well written. Good background and information on Sultanganj Buddha.