|
Satya Nadella, Microsoft CEO |
Since Satya Nadella’s
appointment as Microsoft's CEO, my Facebook news feed and email inbox have
been chock-a-block with stories about what Mr Nadella's success means.
Some think Satya
Nadella’s success is a triumph for “Indian values, like empathy, patience and
humility”. Others think it is “a slap in the face for the Indian system”
(because Mr Nadella felt the need to emigrate to the USA); that it reflects the
“failure of the IITs” (because such a prestigious tech job went to a guy from
lowly Manipal University); that it is a triumph for the game of cricket (because Satya learnt about leadership and
teamwork as a cricket playing schoolboy in Hyderabad); that it reflects the
greatness of Amercia (because you don’t have to be Bill Gates’ son to become
CEO of Microsoft); that it reflects the failure of America (because homegrown
talent lags so far behind educated, motivated immigrants); that it reflects the
skills Mr. Nadella learnt at his family dinner table (his father was a senior IAS
officer who served on India’s Planning Commission); etc. etc.
All these
interpretations are have some basis in fact.
But having absorbed all these interpretations, my conclusion is that Satya
Nadella's success is a contemporary Rorschach Ink Blot test. Any observer’s interpretation tells you a lot about the observer's state of mind. It tells you little or
nothing about the meaning of Mr Nadella’s success,
because Mr. Nadella’s success doesn’t actually mean anything, beyond the very specific
context of Microsoft’s executive team.
The human brain
is amazingly good at seeing patterns, even when there aren’t any patterns to see.