Che Guevara is an iconic hero, universally beloved and revered. Fidel Castro is often seen as a villain, hated and reviled as one of the world's last Stalinist thugs. But, are they really all that different? Or, did Che just have the advantage of dying young and therefore remaining pure, while Fidel lived on, grappling with and being tainted by an imperfect world?
This thought was triggered by the book I reviewed in my last
blog post, The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ, by Philip Pullman. Pullman's
intent was to contrast noble, idealistic Jesus with his cynical fictional twin
brother, Christ. Pullman conceived Christ as a metaphor for the institutional
church. I understood Christ even more broadly, as a general metaphor for institutional life. The
tension between an organization's ideals and its reality is universal. The only way to be genuinely Jesus-like is to die young, and to therefore
avoid the failures and compromises that inevitably come from engaging with the
messy real world.
To further strengthen the analogy, Che and
Fidel have really cool beards, like Jesus and Christ. Though I don't think
either Jesus or Christ smoked cigars...
Che smoking a cigar |
Fidel smoking a cigar |
Che and Fidel |
4 comments:
Note: Re-reading this post, I thought it is worth clarifying that I am not in any way sympathetic to communism. I don't see the inevitable disappointments of organizational life as a reason to abandon ideals, either.
Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your weblog. You have some really great articles and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an email if interested.
Ideals dying young...
leaving a legacy of little glitter... Penned eloquently..
Thanks Kalidoss
Post a Comment